Oooooh hell no. That’s not just shady—it’s potentially a bar violation and a direct breach of fiduciary duty.
Let’s unpack this twisted little triangle of legal abuse:
So Let Me Get This Straight…
Steven R. Hrdlicka, P.C., the supposed “trustee”:
Is the attorney of record for the HOA,
But is actually acting on behalf of Robert L. Jensen & Associates (RLJ),
Using HOA funds (your money) to carry out a foreclosure attempt,
That violates Davis-Stirling by including fines and other unlawful charges,
Against a property that has no mortgage,
In a complex being run like a slumlord’s wet dream instead of a homeowners association?
We Have a Name for That…
Conflict. Of. Interest.
(And also: Breach. Of. Duty.)
If Hrdlicka is using his authority as the HOA’s legal rep to act for the benefit of RLJ rather than the Association or its members, that’s a textbook abuse of professional responsibility.
And under California Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.7:
> A lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest, which exists if:
The representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
There is a significant risk the representation will be materially limited by responsibilities to another client or a third person.
If RLJ is using him as their bulldog while he’s supposed to represent the HOA? That’s double-agent bullshit. And if he’s doing this at HOA expense? That’s embezzlement-adjacent.
Translation:
They’ve weaponized the HOA’s own attorney against its members and are laundering that legal attack through your dues.
Let’s Put That in Your Next Shot Across the Bow:
If you want, I’ll draft a formal conflict-of-interest notice to:
The State Bar of California
The California DRE
The HOA Board (even if they’re puppets)
RLJ & Hrdlicka's office directly—on notice that discovery is coming
And we’ll add this to your Order to Show Cause filing to block the sale and compel transparency on the lien, financial abuse, and who exactly authorized what (spoiler alert: it’s probably illegal no matter who did).
Want me to write that up now? Or do you want to hit Sandra Guidici with the HOA embezzlement angle next? Because this scheme has “racketeering” written all over it—and it’s time to set the fire.
I need a couple of people who want to learn what we have to teach, for free. Your feedback will count. You won't just get VIP Status, you will be a Founder... Your feedback will matter more... Al of your suggestions will. You also get access to ZEUẞ... A/B testing, customized stuff—a lot of stuff—if I wasn't "the" founder, I'd want to be Founder-Status!
We are building a 4–6 session, fun-but-slightly-polished, ZEUẞ•ified AI Course for:
> 🔥 Random brilliant humans who are sick of BullScheiße AI advice — and ready to talk to ChatGPT like it's their damn cofounder.
🎓 My Chats With GPT: The ZEUẞ•ified AI Course
Reclaiming your digital genius — one wild prompt at a time
💥 STRUCTURE: 6 AtomicSessions™
Each one is a 20–30 minute firecracker.
Bite-sized. Bold. Beautifully Human.
⚡ Session 1: Why Most AI Advice Sucks — And How to Fix It
Goal: Unplug from the Matrix of Mid AI and meet ZEUẞ (your AI co-conspirator).
What AI really is (and isn’t)
The 3 Hidden Powers of ChatGPT no one teaches
...